Sunday 2 October 2016

Fake Terrorism II

In regard to the supposed crash of UA93 (a Boeing 757) at Shanksville, Pensylvania. Notice the pictures of the crash site immediately in the aftermath of the crash. Notice that as witnesses said, there was no item of debris bigger than a briefcase.

Compare these pictures with the crash scene of the Germanwings A320 which flew into a mountain in France under power of acceleration, the plane accelerated on its descent into the mountain. The collision speed with the ground was in excess of 400mph or 325kt. Please notice the huge amount of debris. Witnesses said that there was no item of debris bigger than a car.

In terms of relative size, a Boeing 757 is a bit bigger than an Airbus 320, it is some 30 foot longer and each wing is 4 foot longer. So a Boeing 757 crash would result in more debris not less.

Well one thing is evident. Whatever the alleged collision velocity, the site at Shanksville, Pensylvania is not the scene of the crash of an airliner. One can say this with complete confidence because of the evident lack of debris. Planes do crash, sadly, but there is always debris.

It has now been revealed that UA93 landed at Cleveland Hopkins Airport, Cleveland, Ohio. The passengers were bused to an empty NASA building and never seen again. And if really 200 passengers stepped off that plane, that lends credence to the story in the link below.

The passenger plane that was UA93 has a tail number of N591UA. The aircraft is still in service with United Airlines. The plane that was AA77 is also still in service with American Airlines.

Again, the official story of UA93 is just nonsense. There is a video which purports to show the crash of UA93 as taken through the windscreen of a car that was passing. The video shows a slow speed crash. I have every reason to suspect that that film has been faked. Because, where is the debris? And why, if that was the plane crash was there another site, six or eight miles away where there was more debris?

Similar nonsense has been presented about the crash of AA77 into the Pentagon. Firstly the Boeing 757 had to execute manouvers which would have been very difficult for an experienced pilot at low speed. But the Boeing 757 allegedly executed these manoeuvres at very high speed. Yet there is a big difference been passenger aircraft and military jets. Passenger aircraft are simply not designed to do complex manoeuvres at high speed.

And again there is a huge debris problem. There is simply not the debris of a crashed Boeing 757. Where are the engines, where are the wings, wheels etc. etc. In fact, the Pentagon after the alleged aircraft crash looks exactly like a cruise missile had hit it. Witnesses speak of a white flash and the unmistakable smell of cordite, again evidence of the cordite warhead of a cruise missile.

Let us see what the pilots think:

And now what is known about the planes and passengers:

Here is one analysis which may be partially correct although they make the mistake of accepting the story of the plane crash at Shanksville, Pensylvania. www.serendipity.li/wot/operation_pearl.htm

My impression is that the US government, acting on behalf of the NWO, just imagined that they could tell any lie and the people of the US would believe it.

And because people died. And each person was an individual. Here is a video to remember the dead.

Friday 9 September 2016

Fake Terrorism

Most of the major terrorist attacks have been organised by the New World Order. A classic example is the attack on the twin towers in New York.

The two towers were built each with 4 huge steel girders which went up from the ground to the highest point of the building. If an airliner crashed into one of these buildings, there would have been a fire and a lot of damage but the building itself would have continued to stand. There is no way, whatever the temperature of the fire that the towers would have collapsed the way they did. If the temperature of the fire was hot enough to melt the steel girders, that would have been a local event. The top part of building might have fallen off the main part of the building but there is no way the building could have collapsed the way it did. The only possible explanation was that the buildings were set to collapse by demolition experts who had systematically gone up the building cutting the girders and planting timed explosives so that a gradual collapse of the building could take place.

So a speeding plane hits the building, there is a fire and then, after a pause, the building collapses because someone has pressed a button to set off the explosives. Many people have also pointed out that the buildings were also clad in steel. Each aeroplane is made of aluminium. So however fast the planes were travelling they would have just been crushed against the building. The planes would not have penetrated. So evidently the steel cladding was prepared in advance as well.

And WTC7 which was a CIA building also collapsed for no apparent reason. Presumably the plane that crashed near Shanksville, Pensylvania was intended to crash into WTC7 but it never arrived. So they blew up WTC7 anyway.

Also the Pentagon is one of the most closely observed buildings in the world and yet there is no film of a plane crashing into the building.

The whole deal was an inside job. The NWO blew up the three buildings in the WTC complex and set off explosives beside the Pentagon.

And Osama bin Laden ? He was a patsy. President Obama's people managed eventually to kill the patsy.

And the point of all the murderous New World Order activity ? To instill fear into the population of the world. To create a fake battle between radical muslims and the West. To make everyone afraid. And that fear affects the vibration of everyone.
">

Tuesday 18 August 2015

There are shape-changing lizards amongst us. They seek power over us.

David Icke talking to Arizona Wilder
We have been manipulated for many, many generations. Her list of participants in these devil worshiping ceremonies is eye-opening.


This is an interview with Credo Mutwa


As it happens, we do not need to worry abut this as the Earth has opened its heart chakra in October 2014.  So the planet is ascending and the reptiles will have to leave us anyway in the next couple of years.  See www.the-new-earth.info

Wednesday 27 May 2015

The brains of men and women change with circumstances; how any why it is important to understand.

The brains of women undergo dramatic changes at the various major events in a woman's life and I don't just mean pregnancy. In fact the biochemical soup in which women operate transforms them many times in their lives. How and why and what the consequences are is worth examining.
This is Louann Brizendine's book on the female brain.  She is a good writer and although she gives you the science, she also gives you anecdote. So the book is often amusing and sometimes funny.  But you really do get to understand the why.



This is Louann Brizendine's companion volume The Male Brain. The male brain exists in a different biochemical soup. There are fewer wholesale changes in the structure of the male brain but there are changes. How and why the male brain changes is also worth examining. Also the difference between boys and girls comes down to the difference in the biochemistry of the male brain. Again the book is skillfully written with the science explained but illustrated with anecdote which is often funny.

Saturday 28 February 2015

The End of Chistianity


James McDonald has written a very angry book. But he has reason to be angry. Bible scholarship has shown time and again how the Bible was extensively modified. He shows how stories like the Nativity were just faked by Church fathers to make the birth of Jesus seem a portentous event and they added their fiction to the Gospels, the originals of which never contained the story of the Nativity. The origin of the Virgin Mary myth just comes from the insistence of the Church fathers of finding major events prophesied in the Old Testament;  so they found Isaiah 7:14 which was mistranslated into the koine Greek Septuagint; a translation made some 200 years before the birth of Jesus. The correct translation refers to a young woman not a virgin. These are just two issues that press my buttons but in fact McDonald shows clearly that the whole edifice of Christian belief is just so much made-up poppycock. Furthermore this poppycock has been a disaster for the western world where it held back scientific research for so long.

So what do we have now ? We have the teachings of Jeshua (Jesus is the Greek form of his name) in the two books he has given us through the channelling process: A Course in Miracles and The Way of Mastery (in 3 volumes). And for the Course, I recommend the original text. These are his direct words and they don't try to found a religion, instead they talk about spirituality and what he says is very real. And welcome to a world where we are all sons and daughters of God.

     And if you want to hear Jeshua preach live, you can because Pamela Kribbe channels him, see www.jeshua.net

Friday 27 February 2015

The Failure of the Peace in Libya

In a previous post I discussed the failure of the peace in Iraq. Now sadly we must also acknowledge the failure of the peace in Libya. Here the situation was different and the reasons for the failure of the peace are different. This time I will show you a well written article by Glenn Greenwald that looks at many sides of the problem:
 
Sadly Google Blogspot will not print Glenn Greenwald newspaper articles any more. I have to leave you to search for them yourself.

Sunday 26 October 2014

Men and Women together

Here I present the intuitive understanding of Théun Mares. But first I should speak about him, he was born in 1952 and died in 2011. He was genuinely a very intuitive guy in his search for the truth about the world we live in. The way to approach this type of intuitive material is to ask yourself the question; “Does it feel right ?”. To me, on the subject of men and women together, his work does feel right.

See the Yin-Yang symbol:

Each man has his internal femininity, whether you choose to take that as the dark spot in the white or the white spot in the dark does not matter. Similarly, each woman has her internal masculinity.
What this is ultimately about is the man understanding himself, because to understand his internal femininity he must find a representative of that femininity he can observe in the real world.
It is exactly the same for the woman. She seeks a man who represents as closely as he can her internal masculinity. Again she seeks to understand herself by observing that representative of her masculinity being active in the real world.
But there is a second thing happening beyond this search for understanding the self. That is because we live in a world of doing. So the woman seeks a man whose purpose she can support. So the man and his purpose provide the woman with a context within which and to which she can provide the support of her femininity.
The man's purpose may be only to raise a family in peace and security. He may devote himself to building a business. In fact, there are numerous possibilities. But the woman must find a guy whose purpose she can commit to.
Marriages break down when the man can no longer sustain his purpose, whatever it may have been. That is because the woman did not marry a man, she married a man with a purpose. If he can't carry that purpose any more, she will find a man with a similar purpose who can carry it.

Obviously, all I have done here is to provide a kind of summary of Théun Mares's intuitions. If you want to refer to the original material, here are links to his two books on the subject.