Sunday 2 October 2016

Fake Terrorism II

In regard to the supposed crash of UA93 (a Boeing 757) at Shanksville, Pensylvania. Notice the pictures of the crash site immediately in the aftermath of the crash. Notice that as witnesses said, there was no item of debris bigger than a briefcase.

Compare these pictures with the crash scene of the Germanwings A320 which flew into a mountain in France under power of acceleration, the plane accelerated on its descent into the mountain. The collision speed with the ground was in excess of 400mph or 325kt. Please notice the huge amount of debris. Witnesses said that there was no item of debris bigger than a car.

In terms of relative size, a Boeing 757 is a bit bigger than an Airbus 320, it is some 30 foot longer and each wing is 4 foot longer. So a Boeing 757 crash would result in more debris not less.

Well one thing is evident. Whatever the alleged collision velocity, the site at Shanksville, Pensylvania is not the scene of the crash of an airliner. One can say this with complete confidence because of the evident lack of debris. Planes do crash, sadly, but there is always debris.

It has now been revealed that UA93 landed at Cleveland Hopkins Airport, Cleveland, Ohio. The passengers were bused to an empty NASA building and never seen again. And if really 200 passengers stepped off that plane, that lends credence to the story in the link below.

The passenger plane that was UA93 has a tail number of N591UA. The aircraft is still in service with United Airlines. The plane that was AA77 is also still in service with American Airlines.

Again, the official story of UA93 is just nonsense. There is a video which purports to show the crash of UA93 as taken through the windscreen of a car that was passing. The video shows a slow speed crash. I have every reason to suspect that that film has been faked. Because, where is the debris? And why, if that was the plane crash was there another site, six or eight miles away where there was more debris?

Similar nonsense has been presented about the crash of AA77 into the Pentagon. Firstly the Boeing 757 had to execute manouvers which would have been very difficult for an experienced pilot at low speed. But the Boeing 757 allegedly executed these manoeuvres at very high speed. Yet there is a big difference been passenger aircraft and military jets. Passenger aircraft are simply not designed to do complex manoeuvres at high speed.

And again there is a huge debris problem. There is simply not the debris of a crashed Boeing 757. Where are the engines, where are the wings, wheels etc. etc. In fact, the Pentagon after the alleged aircraft crash looks exactly like a cruise missile had hit it. Witnesses speak of a white flash and the unmistakable smell of cordite, again evidence of the cordite warhead of a cruise missile.

Let us see what the pilots think:

And now what is known about the planes and passengers:

Here is one analysis which may be partially correct although they make the mistake of accepting the story of the plane crash at Shanksville, Pensylvania. www.serendipity.li/wot/operation_pearl.htm

My impression is that the US government, acting on behalf of the NWO, just imagined that they could tell any lie and the people of the US would believe it.

And because people died. And each person was an individual. Here is a video to remember the dead.

Friday 9 September 2016

Fake Terrorism

Most of the major terrorist attacks have been organised by the New World Order. A classic example is the attack on the twin towers in New York.

The two towers were built each with 4 huge steel girders which went up from the ground to the highest point of the building. If an airliner crashed into one of these buildings, there would have been a fire and a lot of damage but the building itself would have continued to stand. There is no way, whatever the temperature of the fire that the towers would have collapsed the way they did. If the temperature of the fire was hot enough to melt the steel girders, that would have been a local event. The top part of building might have fallen off the main part of the building but there is no way the building could have collapsed the way it did. The only possible explanation was that the buildings were set to collapse by demolition experts who had systematically gone up the building cutting the girders and planting timed explosives so that a gradual collapse of the building could take place.

So a speeding plane hits the building, there is a fire and then, after a pause, the building collapses because someone has pressed a button to set off the explosives. Many people have also pointed out that the buildings were also clad in steel. Each aeroplane is made of aluminium. So however fast the planes were travelling they would have just been crushed against the building. The planes would not have penetrated. So evidently the steel cladding was prepared in advance as well.

And WTC7 which was a CIA building also collapsed for no apparent reason. Presumably the plane that crashed near Shanksville, Pensylvania was intended to crash into WTC7 but it never arrived. So they blew up WTC7 anyway.

Also the Pentagon is one of the most closely observed buildings in the world and yet there is no film of a plane crashing into the building.

The whole deal was an inside job. The NWO blew up the three buildings in the WTC complex and set off explosives beside the Pentagon.

And Osama bin Laden ? He was a patsy. President Obama's people managed eventually to kill the patsy.

And the point of all the murderous New World Order activity ? To instill fear into the population of the world. To create a fake battle between radical muslims and the West. To make everyone afraid. And that fear affects the vibration of everyone.
">